Category Archives: Writing

Seeing Things In CSI: Las Vegas “Sheltered”

SPOILER ALERT.  I was watching CSI: Las Vegas with my wife and teenager last night, the 4/2 episode “Sheltered.”  (For the record, I’m not a super-fan.  I had to look that up.)  The first act suspect is a a bomb-shelter-living character subjected to a sketchy search by the CSI team.  His attorney has all the evidence against him deemed inadmissible.  I said, “I think they’re jumping to conclusions about this guy.” My wife says, “Of course the Democrat over here thinks the cops are at fault.”*

She was just messing around, but she started a conversation about the law and the degree to which different people value the need to insure that the rights of every man are protected.  My wife is comfortable with collateral damage – a few innocent people getting pinched and some rights getting trampled to get more criminals behind bars.  I’m much better with a few criminals getting away if it means that we can be sure nobody’s rights are disregarded.

Both my wife and my daughter said that they could never represent a guilty man in court.  I, on the other hand, said that I could do it and sleep like a baby (especially if I could do so on the grounds of illegal search and seizure).

As the story unfolded, my prediction turned out to be right.  It turned out that the man and his daughter were the victims of a violent crime who retreated from the world in an underground bunker to stay safe.  At the end of the episode they decide to leave the shelter and move to a small town in Oregon to start a new life in the larger world.  It was a great metaphor and a good story (good job Michael FX Daley).

One cannot live in fear and isolation.  Fear is the twisting and perverting fire that heats the shield so that it can be all too easily pounded into a sword.  The entire purpose of Law should be to defend and protect.  Not just from criminals, but from police, judges, prejudice, and general unfairness.

—————————————————————————————

*My wife as much interest in politics as I have in fashion.  Her political sorter has three bins: Democrat, Republican, and Communist.  I don’t know what I am, but it ain’t one of those three.  If the Libertarians and the Green Party had babies I might be one of those.

Next Novel Behind Schedule (and a little teaser)

Writing Progress 130326Somehow I’ve managed to get behind on the next novel.  It’s not like this is my first book, but it’s still hard to hit the 1,000 words per day quota when you’re working a full time job, participating in a martial arts club, raising kids, maintaining a blog (and whining about how you’re behind schedule), etc.

Time to buckle down.

This is going to be a bigger book than the last one, and not just in terms of total words.  It’s got more characters, more layers of perspective, and more complexity.

The 14th Mansion is story of three unlikely characters — a homeless man, a biker, and a witch — trying find a lost college student who may have fallen prey to a serial killer.  It has strange plot turns, twisted villains, occult themes, sex, profanity, and at every moment the threat of violence and doom.   It’s a dark book punctuated with points of light in the form of humor and the possibility of redemption.

And if I can get back on schedule, it will be released in July.

Quote Me on This

In a previous post I said I wanted to see the world “philistine”* re-enter common usage.  Why?  Because philistines and their rampant philistinism are at an all-time high.  Don’t struggle to describe these people — use the perfect word!

Since we’re rediscovering the word, let’s use it in a sentence:

“Religious dogma, social convention, and philistinism are the hammer, tong, and anvil of mediocrity.”  ~Robert Mitchell

I wish you would quote me on this.  I really really do.  In fact, if you quote me on your blog or website and post a link to it in the comments below, I will email you a coupon for a free download of my novel Ghilan.  Or, if you prefer, I will just jump up and down, sing your praises, and generally scamper about and proclaim what a smart and well-informed person you are.

* Philistine (Phi*lis”tine):  A person deficient in liberal culture and refinement; one without appreciation of the nobler aspirations and sentiments of humanity; one whose scope is limited to selfish and material interests.  (Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, 1913 Edition)

UPDATERachel Izabella reblogged my quote.  So, as promised, this is a photo of me snapped mid-scamper.  As for singing her praises, let me say that Rachel’s blog is fascinating, fun, sometimes funny and other times sad, but always well informed — and she obviously has great taste in quotations.  I’d send her a coupon for a free download of my book but she already has it (and didn’t hate it).  You rock Rachel!

photo(1)

“Generally scampering about”

Marcus Aurelius and Our Ever-Declining IQ

Marcus Aurelius said this.  He was a Roman Emperor who lived and ruled almost 2,000 years ago.

“Everything harmonizes with me, which is harmonious to thee, O Universe. Nothing for me is too early or too late, which is in due time for thee. There is one light of the sun, though it is interrupted by walls, mountains and infinite other things. There is one common substance, though it is distributed among countless bodies which have their several qualities. There is one soul, though it is distributed among several natures and individual limitations. There is one intelligent soul, though it seems to be divided.”

This is from AureliusMeditations, a collection of his philosophical thoughts. In addition to being an emperor, he is considered one of the great Stoic philosophers.  Can you imagine any modern leader being remembered for anything in 2,000 years?

Part of the reason why we find it hard to imagine the emergence of a modern version of Marcus Aurelius is the issue of diminishing IQ.  To put it bluntly, people just aren’t as smart as they used to be.  Ever-declining IQ — not just in the U.S. where it is down at least 3 points just since 1950,  but worldwide — should be a serious concern for all of us.  Read more about it here.

But the real stumbling block is the ever-increasing shallowness of American life, where philistinism is a badge worn proudly.  A man like Marcus Aurelius would be laughed off the podium, derided as a dreamer, a metaphysical fruit loop, a thinker not a “doer.”  To fire up a crowd these days all you have to do is sip a Big Gulp at CPAC.*  Meanwhile, the supposed ‘leader of the free world,’ in an over-populated, over-heated world screaming for sustainability, is still banging the drum for the clearly obsolete growth model of economics.   The longer I live the more Idiocracy looks like hard science fiction instead of farce.

Where is the America that produced Thomas Paine, whose pamphlet Common Sense so deeply inspired America’s early revolutionaries?  Paine was an anti-Christian deist, occultist, and Freemason who had a fascination for Druidism and was a close friend to the famous poet, visionary, and mystic William Blake.  I bet he read Aurelius, and there is at least a chance he’ll be spoken of in the year 3776 (assuming Earth still has an atmosphere).

Aurelius endures.  As for the leaders of the 21st century, I see none of them withstanding a 2,000 year test of time.

*For the record, I’m not a fan of bans on big sugary drinks — even though I know they’re horrible for your health — because I’m a fan of personal freedom.  I just think that public political figures should get standing ovations for substantive positions not theater.

How Left and Right are Physically Different

Do you think that your political affiliation is based on freedom of choice?  Careful and reasoned  evaluation of facts?  Common sense?  Well, you might have made your choice based on the makeup of your brain.

A wealth of studies now show that there are physical differences between people who define themselves as Liberal and Conservative.  Let me break them down for you:

1. Conservatives spend more time looking at unpleasant images, and liberals spend more time looking at pleasant images.

2. Reliance on quick, efficient, and “low effort” thought processes yields conservative ideologies, while effortful and deliberate reasoning yields liberal ideologies.

3. Conservatives react more strongly than liberals to disgusting images, such as a picture of someone eating worms.

4. Liberals have more tolerance to uncertainty (bigger anterior cingulate cortex), and conservatives have more sensitivity to fear (bigger right amygdala).

5. Conservatives have stronger motivations than liberals to preserve purity and cleanliness.

6. Liberals follow the direction of eye movements better than conservatives.

7. Republicans are more likely than Democrats to interpret faces as threatening and expressing dominant emotions, while Democrats show greater emotional distress and lower life satisfaction.

8. Conservatives and liberals react similarly to positive incentives, but conservatives have greater sensitivity to negative stimuli.

9. Conservatives have more activity in their dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, the part of the brain that activates for complex social evaluations.

10. Conservatism is focused on preventing negative outcomes, while liberalism is focused on advancing positive outcomes.

11. Genetics influence political attitudes during early adulthood and beyond.

12. Compared to liberals, conservatives are less open to new experiences and learn better from negative stimuli than positive stimuli.

13. Conservatives tend to have a stronger reaction to threatening noises and images than liberals.

14. Liberals are more open-minded and creative whereas conservatives are more orderly and better organized.

15. When faced with a conflict, liberals are more likely than conservatives to alter their habitual response when cues indicate it is necessary.

16. Conservatives sleep more soundly and have more mundane dreams, while liberals sleep more restlessly and have a more bizarre, active dream life.

Read the whole article at Procon.org.

Slowing Down the Waterfall

image

Waterfall at Bryan Park

You’re a goal driven person.  You maintain focus on what matters, cut away superfluous activity, stick to the plan.  Goals are met and things achieved.

Then one day you realize that life is happening somewhere out there instead of right here, that life’s water is slipping over the dam.

Slow down the waterfall.  Take a minute to stand still and experience the flow.  Breathe.

Re-evaluate the goals later.  For now, just be.  Think about absolutely nothing.

Ms. Ishmael’s Box

My story Ms. Ishmael’s Box is one of the top-rated stories in the “Teleport Us” Sci-Fi short story contest over at LitReactor with a 100% thumbs-up rating.  It has been as high as #5 but is currently at #12.  And if I win, what’s the prize?  I get my story read and critiqued by none other than Chuck Palahniuk.

If you’re on LitReactor, go read and rate it.

Here’s the description:

“When retired teacher Ms. Ishmael is shot and killed by crossing guards on the front lawn of a local high school it’s up to Det. Washington to find out why she refused to stop when challenged — and to uncover what’s so important about the box she was carrying when she fell.”

.

A-Bombs, Rock Music, and Fission vs. Fashion

In 1945, in advance of the first test of an atomic bomb, scientists feared that as each atom split it might split another creating a chain reaction that could ignite the atmosphere and destroy planet Earth.  But they went ahead anyway.

A decade later Elvis Presley started another fission-like explosion with his ’56 performance on the Ed Sullivan show, witnessed by a record-breaking 60 million viewers.  He had performed before, and parents and network execs feared he would destroy America, but Sullivan dropped the bomb anyway.  By ’64 we had Bob Dylan’s The Times They Are a-Changin’ and yes indeedy they were.  Rock and Roll exploded, a fissionable material that split into dozens of genres and sub-genres.  We had the Beetles, the Rolling Stones, The Who, Hendrix, Led Zeppelin, Yes, Rush, and a thousand others, Acid Rock, Punk, Prog Rock, Heavy Metal, and the list goes on.  Everywhere you looked, kids were hanging out, listening to Rock that was meaty, dense, deep, and potentially transformative.

But, as it turned out, just as the first atomic bomb had not started the never-ending explosion some scientists feared, the bomb that was Rock and Roll began to fizzle.  By 1984, completely without irony, Eddie Van Halen was performing with the Jacksons, Ray Parker’s Ghostbusters was a hit,  and cats were sleeping with dogs.  Fission had been replaced by Fashion.  The streams had crossed but it was another kind of destruction.  We had gone from American Woman and  L.A. Woman to Girls Just Want to Have Fun and Like a Virgin.  Sure, there were pops and bangs, explosions of light, albums like Dreamtime, Too Tough to Die, Stop Making Sense, and many others.  But ’84 saw a lot more albums like Van Halen’s 1984 than it did albums like the Eurythmics’ 1984.  The explosion was fading like ripples in a pond.

By 1984, the kids who sprawled on the bedroom floor listening to the same album fives times in a row while handing the liner notes back and forth had been replaced by kids plugged into their Sony Walkmans.  The conversations were gone.  The cassettes had no liner notes, not like the albums did anyway.  By the time Judas Priest came to trial in 1990, the idea that playing rock backwards could reveal dangerous and radical messages was on the decline.  The science just didn’t support the idea that the messages had any impact on the listener, and according to many scientists and even the artists themselves, the ‘messages’ were only random phonemes.  The threat just wasn’t there — even it you played it frontwards.  By 1990, the idea that Rock could inform, inspire and teach the mainstream was dead.  If you wanted to be challenged by your Rock you had to go digging.

As Angus Young of AD/DC famously said, “We never hid the messages.  We called the album Highway to Hell.  It was right there in front of them.”  But Angus and boys didn’t really have a message that was all that deep.  Occult means hidden, not right out front, and hedonism is not occultism or even radicalism.  AC/DC is not a radical band or an occult band, and Angus missed the point.

The biggest occult bands, in terms or records sold at least, are/were probably Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, The Doors, and Blue Öyster Cult.  All four of these bands come at youth with messages overt and covert, lessons exoteric and esoteric.  Square parents who wanted their kids to conform didn’t have to work very hard to hear the danger in songs like Black Dog, War Pigs, Sweet Leaf, and Cities on Flame with Rock and Roll.  But if John and Jane Parent wanted to hear something dangerous in what their kids were listening to they might have to work a little harder if they wanted to find offense in Break on Through, Stairway to Heaven or Lips in the Hills.  These bands made albums that you could listen to over and over again, dozens of times, finding something new with each and every play — a reference to something obscure that could lead you to another album, to the library, to the picket line, or simply into a thousand conversations, inspirations, and lines of inquiry.

The only one of the big ones you can still see live is Blue Öyster Cult.  For me they are the best of the occult rock bands, with messages either in your face (as in The Red and the Black about a sadistic Royal Canadian Mounted Policeman) or hidden (not by backmasking but by vocabulary, metaphor, and double entendre, as in Mistress of the Salmon Salt, probably the darkest, most unsettling, and subtlest occult rock song ever written).  They are still on tour forever, playing newer tunes like See You in Black from ’98 and older songs like E.T.I. from back in ’76 (you could write a book about the occult references in that one).   Sadly, the newer stuff doesn’t contain the occult influences they once flaunted.  Perhaps those influences withered when Sandy Pearlman stopped actively associating with them.

Sandy Pearlman is still around and still relevant.  In addition to his extensive work as a lyricist and producer for BÖC, he was the producer behind some great records by the likes of The Clash, The Dictators, Pavlov’s Dog, and Dream Syndicate.  Currently he’s the Schulich Distinguished Professor Chair at the Schulich School of Music at McGill University in Montreal.

If you want to hear some really intense occult revelations, check out a couple of his recent offerings at Huffpo.  In his Patti Smith obit he talks about her as an incarnation of Athena, discusses the British Invasion as the new death of the Goddess cult, and much more.  You might also like this article on the death of Ellie Greenwich, wherein he reveals the secrets behind her largely forgotten place as perhaps the greatest songwriter of all time.

Sandy is still the same I guess.  He reveals a little here and there, stepping out into the light to reveal just enough to pique your interest, and then stepping back into the shadows.  In your face just enough to get your attention, holding back enough to keep you interested.  A few people that is.

There was a time when bands like Blue Öyster Cult could fill stadiums, night after night, across a worldwide tour.  And while there have been and always will be bright lights in the constellation of Rock — Rage Against the Machine for example, but sure not the only one — the days when almost every kid in the world spend entire afternoons and evenings thinking, comparing, criticizing, commenting, getting inspired by their Rock, are gone.  Looks like the one-two punch of Walkman-iPod stopped the conversation dead in its tracks.

Compare the old material — albums based around the occult origins of World War I, the literal and metaphorical importance of  the alien abduction phenomenon, the nature of free will, and on and on and on — to the kind of material that packs stadiums today: songs about sex, violence, materialism, or simply nothing.

Tell me John and Jane Parent, which is the most subversive and dangerous: the old music or the new?  If I were you, instead of an iTunes card I’d hand my kid a $50 bill and send her down to the new corner vinyl store that probably cropped up recently.  My guess is that there are some very deep conversations taking place over there, and that those kids and those stores promise hope for our future.

Writing Progress Report (and some perspective)

I’m a little behind the plan on the new novel, but after some extra writing time Friday night, I’m starting to catch up.  The 14th Mansion — which features characters from both of my previous novels by the way — should come in around 80,000 words.  Which means I’m more that a quarter of the way through in just 30 days.

I also entered a short story called Ms. Ishmael’s Box in a contest over at Litreactor.  So far the story has a 100% positive rating.  The prize?  A chance to get feedback from lots of great writers (including Chuck Palahniuk).

Speaking of Palahniuk, here’s a quote from the movie Fight Club which was based on his novel of the same name.  It leads nicely into what I want to talk about next:

“This is your life, and it’s ending one minute at a time.”

One of the things that has made writing for more fun and easy is my perspective.  Since putting my books up on Smashwords last year and really taking the plunge, I’ve used my martial arts training and knowledge of the occult to turn my perspective inside-out.

When I was younger, becoming a successful author seemed like an impossible task and an unattainable goal.  But now I see that if you want to be a writer, you just be a writer.  This applies to whatever a person wants to do or achieve.  I redefined the phrase ‘successful author.’  A successful author approaches the craft of writing with sincerity and writes stuff that people enjoy reading — no more and no less.

Defining success in terms of money is a trap.  Money is not lived.  Life is lived, and it is fleeting; it wants to be spent in the practice of whatever craft that beckons you.  This is your life, and it’s ending one minute at a time.

Whatever it is you want to be, I suggest you become it today.

Writing Progress on The14th Mansion

Writing Progress on The14th Mansion

Punishing Poetry: Number 37

I haven’t been into football since I was a kid.  By the time I got to college I couldn’t be bothered with it.  But there was a time, back in the 1970s, when I was a true fan.  I even played a season of flag football when I was in I think 9th grade.

I do however always watch the Superbowl, a tradition that started when I watched Superbowl III with Pop.  While I was watching this last one I started thinking about my favorite player from back in the 1970s — #37 Pat Fischer.  He was defensive back for the Redskins.

Pat Fischer was 5’9″ tall and just 170 pounds (just a shade bigger than yours truly), so small he had to have his jerseys made special, yet he was one of the most punishing hitters ever to play the game.  He played an amazing 17 seasons, during which time he racked up 56 interceptions (in the NFL top 20).  He is also credited with inventing the “bump-and-run” coverage technique that was eventually banned by the league.  Tenacious, scrappy, and dogged, he was like a pack of jackals.  And if you took your eyes off of him while crossing the middle, you might wake up in the locker room.

You can read a really detailed bio here.

As documented in this article, Pat liked his poetry.  Here’s one of his favorites.  RIP Pat — you were one tough little S.O.B.

Here’s To The Men Who Lose (author unknown)

Here’s to the men who lose!
What though their work be e’er so nobly planned,
And watched with zealous care,
No glorious halo crowns their efforts grand;
Contempt is failure’s share.

Here’s to the men who lose!
If Triumph’s easy smile our struggles greet,
Courage is easy then;
The King is he, who after fierce defeat,
Can up and fight again.

Here’s to the men who lose!
The ready plaudits of a fawning world
Ring sweet in victors’ ears;
The vanquished banners never are unfurled,
For them there sound no cheers.

Here’s to the men who lose!
the touchstone of true worth is not success.
There is a higher test –
Though fate may darkly frown, onward to press,
And bravely do one’s best.

Here’s to the men who lose!
It is the vanquished’s praises that I sing.
And this is the toast I choose:
“A hard-fought failure is a noble thing!
Here’s to the men who lose.”